Update on Being Fired for Using a Figure of Speech
Since Tuesday when I was fired for using a figure of speech my story has been read over 3000 times and I have an interview on a nationally syndicated radio program, Steel on Steel. Ill tell you how to listen to it and post an MP3 on my site when I have one.
I originally didn’t name the company thinking it might harm my relationships with other clients. But I’ve thought about what is really going on at Consumers Energy and believe that the entire story needs to be exposed in order to fix the problem. Back when the Enron fraud happened Consumers Energy also faced criminal charges for doing similar types of things. To avoid serious legal problems they put in Sarbanes Oxley (SOX) control everywhere. How does this connect to Zero Tolerance Policies? Instead of holding people accountable for their actions Sarbanes Oxley requires companies to document every last detail of everything. If the company has these so called controls then they can claim they did everything to prevent fraud like happened at Enron. What this really did was drown everyone in useless paperwork and give a pass to management for any illegal activities. The Zero Tolerance Policies act the same way. Instead of dealing with real issues in a productive way to find and resolve problems they just follow procedure. Everything even remotely related to violence is treated like actual violence. No one thinks at all. So the people that are actually trying to get work worry about accidentally breaking some rule and losing their job. And every employee is told to report anything and everything no matter how ridiculous. And management doesn’t filter anything. The whole system is guilt by accusation, no trial, instant death penalty (fired on the spot). But of course real offenses like purchasing software that continual fails leaving thousands of people without power and potentially in danger of gas leaks and downed power lines is ignored. Why did they buy it? Was it the best program they reviewed? No. Other companies were using it so they bought the “safe choiceâ€. This endangers people’s lives, livelihood and shareholders (think 401K) value. Personal responsibility is the solution. Even if the crazy policies are in place you don’t have to turn your brain off. First, don’t report every little thing. Use some common sense. Regarding fears of violence follow these ideas, and also read “How to Stop Suicide Bombers and other Criminals” For companies, make these changes to the policies. It’s OK to have a Zero Tolerance for REAL VIOLENCE. Make sure there is real violence, not just feelings or supposed threats. Real responsibility starts and ends with individuals. You have the power, use it. Use it wisely.What is the solution?
Summary
Comments
[…] I feel, stunned, confused, sad and disappointed. Today I became another victim of Zero Tolerance Policies. I was fired from one of the power companies in Michigan today because of a Zero Tolerance Policy. What horrible evil did I do? […]
[…] How to Solve Zero Tolerance Policies Slashdot It! […]
Interesting thought occurred to me while listening to the interview and reading this article. In 1945, in Nuremberg, some Nazis explained why they aren’t guilty by saying, “I just followed the orders.” It wasn’t considered then as a good reason to let them free – they were actually sentenced for their crimes. Nowadays, in the most democratic country in the world, the same wording makes people immune to any kind of justice: I followed the orders, and the hell with consequences! Where are we heading with “political correctness” and “zero tolerance”?
We worry about liability (lie-ability?) rather than about “doing the right things.” It seems so wrong, doesn’t it?
Listened to Steelonsteel program and your interview by John and was amazed as how our society has gotten to be so PC nuts.Living in Montana, I haven’t experienced much of this yet!
I completely agree to your solution to this PC crap. Keep up the good fight, and thank you again for a very enlightening program.
Sincerely,
Brian