How to stop suicide bombers, crazed gunmen, and other terrorists.
One of the most frightening threats today is suicidal murderers. Either organized militant terrorists or crazed individuals, we feel helpless against their attacks. Is there a way to prevent the attacks?
Yes there is!
There are two innovative approaches to stopping suicidal murderers. You could diagram protecting people or you can diagram the terrorist’s process then find ways to stop it.
If you stop any of the functions in the terrorist’s process you prevent the terrorist act. So, let’s approach the problem that way. Figure out the functions of terrorism then find ways to prevent any or all of them.
You may have heard of Motive, Method and Opportunity. Investigators look for those three to figure out who committed a crime. If you look at this a little deeper you find that a potential criminal considers a few more things. The complete set of things needed to commit a crime make up the criminal process.
There are five functions in the terrorism process.
- Desire — some goal believed to be unattainable any other way
- Identify Victim — find people that are weaker than attacker
- Connect to Goal — identify victims that have significance to goal
- Power over Victim — Actually have more power than victims
- Access to Victims
A normal criminal wants to get away with the crime and would have an extra function. The terrorist doesn’t care about getting caught or killed. Normal criminals are deterred by the chance of getting caught later. They worry about being identified. Terrorists don’t care about getting caught.
Security cameras, lights, alarms, harsh penalties, background checks, none of those have any meaning to a terrorist. Many anti-criminal tactics are worthless on terrorists. The first time you know about the terrorist is after the attack.
Terrorism isn’t totally different from normal crime. Terrorism uses a subset of the criminal process. A normal criminal has all the functions a terrorist does plus some more. So if you solve the terrorism problem you also stop normal crime.
Desire
Everyone is motivated by some desire. We all have things we want. If our desires change then that motivates us to change our actions.
The potential terrorist’s desire goes beyond what they want. They also believe that violence is the best or only way to get what they want. They believe that so strongly that the desire to harm can become the goal.
If you can satisfy the original desire or make violence a less attractive way to get what they want then you’ve prevented terrorism.
What do terrorists want? Political violence can have hidden or even conflicting goals. It’s more helpful to look at the goal of the individual. Because when it comes down to it all you have to do is stop the individual. What does the individual want?
- relief from frustration
- revenge
- gain for someone else
- glory
You can stop terrorism by offering something they want more or show a much easier way to get what they really want.
Relief from Frustration
If the would-be attacker wants something but doesn’t know how to get it the frustration can lead to violence. Love, respect, success, or just to be treated fairly are common desires that would-be attackers often have trouble getting. Since there are always at least 15 ways to achieve any goal the would-be attacker probably didn’t try every way.
Teaching people how to use the Alternatives Grid can help them find ways to reduce frustration and prevent violence.
Revenge
If the attacker was injured or maligned by someone they might seek revenge. The idea of revenge is to even the score, to make the bad guy suffer.
It’s absolutely essential that all forms of violence are stopped and treated. When a victim suffers over a long period of time with no relief they become violent. The violence is often directed towards themselves so we refuse to see it.
A person that lashes out in revenge wants to feel power. It’s essential that any violent act is shown as a type of weakness no matter who does it. All violence must be ridiculed and injustices remedied as quickly as possible.
Gain for Someone Else
Defending their family, freeing their homeland, serving their God or their leaders, these are just some of the ways people kill to benefit someone else. When you think about it gain for someone else is the motivation of all soldiers.
To deter the motivation anyone that might gain for the attack must not be allowed to receive any benefit. If possible, anyone that encouraged an attack must be punished and held accountable for the attack.
Additionally you can offer to reward and protect any attacker that reports an act before it happens. Some of the attackers who are doing it to benefit someone else would prefer to not do the attack but feel forced. If you make a very public effort to reward and protect people that expose planned attacks you can prevent that attack and many more in the future. Because the leaders might try to kill any one that exposes an attack or harm their family you might need to fake the attack to hide the informant. The best way to do that is to make it look like it failed for technical reasons or simply didn’t do as much damage and the informant died in the attempt.
Glory
Even though a suicidal attacker might never experience the fame if they believe they will achieve it through violence they might be motivated to try it. Make sure that murderers receive as little attention as possible and any attention shows them as weak and pathetic.
Identify Victim
A victim is someone or something that has a weakness the terrorist can attack. If the would be terrorist can’t find someone or something that is possible to attack they are stopped. This sounds like a perfect way to prevent terrorism.
In most societies children are very highly valued. And we all know that children are weak. Children can’t easily defend themselves and rely on adults.
Because children are weak and adults are very likely to react to an attack on children they are a top target. It’s critical to make it as difficult as possible to identify children as victims.
Almost everything current society does regarding children helps terrorists. Grouping children together makes them easy to find. Declaring schools “weapon free” makes it easy for terrorists to identify children as defenseless. This has the same effect as putting a pile of food out in the middle of bear territory.
Israel realized this problem and solved it. In the 1970’s several schools were attacked by gun wielding terrorists. Israel enacted a law requiring all children to be accompanied by an armed adult. Since that law no attacks have occurred on Israeli schools.
Any place that people join in groups must be believed to have armed guards. That can be uniformed guards or enough concealed weapons that a terrorist can’t identify a weak victim.
- reduce groupings of weak people
- make armed guards visible
- publicize presence of people are armed
- eliminate schedules to make it hard to pick a time to attack
Connect to Goal
Target or victim must have some connection to the goal. The terrorist must believe that attacking a certain target will achieve the goal. So the goals are important.
- gain for someone else
- glory
- revenge
- relief from frustration
If it’s clear the violent attack won’t achieve the goal that prevents the attack.
Currently when a crazed individual attacks a bunch of people that crazed person becomes a celebrity. Their face is on all the media outlets, their goals are examined, and they might even get free airtime for their manifesto.
Imagine a very different approach. A crazed individual attacks a bunch of people, killing and wounding a large number. The media announces,
A terrible tragedy has occurred. These people were hurt and these people were killed. It was caused by a crazy person. Our sympathy goes out to everyone suffering. We ask you to please make sure you rehearse your defense plans and if you know anyone that seems unstable, reach out to help them to help avoid such a meaningless end. If you’re feeling desperate yourself, please call the toll free number to get help. Again it’s very sad this happened. Please do your part to prevent anything like it in the future.
Can you see anyone feeling glorified by that?
Power over Victim
There are two types of attacks, instant and drawn out. Instant attacks like bombings have to be prevented by focusing on desire, connection to goal, identifying victims, and access to victims. The drawn out attack can be fought with force.
Terrorist don’t attack strong targets. Crazed gunmen are usually after one thing, to feel power over their victim. If you look at any of the crazed gunmen attacks they end the instant anyone with a gun confronts the attacker. And often the attacker kills himself.
If an attacker is determined and doesn’t care about dying the only thing you can do is fight back. Preparing in advance to fight back is your only option.
Terrorists often attack many people. If any one of the potential victims has the ability to stop the terrorist all the others are safe.
To prevent attacks and to stop the unpreventable attacks make sure that any possible victim is armed and educated on self defense. A powerful person is not a victim. The more powerful the general public is the less likely any crime will occur.
Access Victim
If the attacker can’t get to the victim obviously the attack can’t happen. Since you can’t identify an attacker until the attack it is impossible to keep them away from all possible victims.
The best approach is to limit the size and density of groups. If people are spread out it gives each individual more response time from the first attack. After the first attack the terrorist is easy to identify making it easier to escape or launch a good defense. Also if groups are spread out it makes weapons like bombs or chemicals less effective.
Make sure you can always escape when you need. This also applies to fires or other life threatening situations.
Summary
Terrorist attacks can be stopped or damage reduced. Doing any of what I’ve listed stops most crime as well. The steps I listed are cheap and easy to implement.
Just a 25% improvement in each of the 5 elements would reduce crime 76%.
- Reduce desire
- Make victims harder to identify
- Disconnect violence from achieving goals
- Give victims power to defend themselves
- Reduce groups of defenseless people
In an Abundance Society much of the desire leading to violence would be gone. When everyone feels they have power then no one needs to use it.
In the summary, you claimed that these steps were cheap and easy to implement. I was wondering if you could elaborate on the implementations mentioned above. In particular
– Eliminating schedules
– Arming the children
– Teaching the Alternatives Grid to potential attackers
Those don’t seem cheap or easy to me.
I’m also interested in your source data for the claim that 25% improvements in those key motivational areas reduce all crime by 75%. How are these improvements observed and quantified?
Thanks for offering a more proactive solution to terrorism. I look forward to your replies.
I’m very glad you take the article so seriously. Terrorism and crime in general is a big topic so covering it in detail in a short article is impossible. Try the new chat feature if you want more explanation. I’m usually online 9am – 3pm EST Mon – Fri
Remember that you don’t have to do everything 100%. Your goal is to reduce the risk to a point that it’s not worth any more effort. And as I’ll explain in the math you can make small improvements to each piece to get big results overall.
I must stress the prevent aspect will produce the best results for the effort required. Stop desire and you stop terrorism.
Haha, I knew someone would ask me about the 75% calculation. I knew “leaving it to the student to finish” would bite me. I’ll explain it in detail but I’ll do that last because some people are turned off by math.
Teaching the Alternatives Grid.
All it takes is a book or video that can be distributed for free over the Internet. I’m currently working on a book to do that. I plan on collecting donations to cover my costs to produce it, translating into several languages and promoting it but digital distribution is free.
When it’s available please make copies and share.
Eliminating Schedules
From a personal standpoint it’s a good idea to take different routes to and from work. This breaks up your schedule and also trains you to have alternatives for avoiding traffic or to respond to some emergency.
The current schedule system most of the western world follows originated from factories 100 years ago where they didn’t have electric lights. Today people can work any time of day from home or any place in the world. The current government school systems are still based on the 100-year-old schedule. The building are only used 1/3 the time and sit empty at night and on weekends. So you could easily improve productivity and give people more options by having 16 hour or 24 hour school hours. Let parents choose which shift their students will attend or allow some sort of mix and match. Employers already have flextime for employees.
Another increasingly popular option is home schooling. Home schooling has the added benefit of better educational results plus costing less per student on top of the added security and research shows home-schooled children are better emotionally developed and “socialized” than students in large class room settings.
Still another option is tele-classes. Australia has been using these to allow children far from cities access to the same teachers. Instant messenger, Skype, Webinrs, YouTube, Wikipedia and other technologies make tele-classes and other telecommuting widely available, cheap and easy.
There will still be things like concerts sporting events and church gatherings that group people together in at a known time. That is why you should improve all the steps. Security is about layers.
Math
OK, there are 5 pieces. If you have 100% likelihood of each step then that is 1 * 1 * 1 * 1 * 1 = 100% of terrorism. If you reduce the probability of anyone of those then the likelihood of the end result decreases the same amount. But if you reduce the likelihood of more than one or all of them then the results are exponential. .9 * .9 * .9 * .9 * .9 = 59% By reducing the chance of each step by 10% you’ve reduced the total chance by 41%. So, .75 * .75 * .75 * .75 * .75 = 24% chance of terrorism.
This is great because it avoids the problem of diminishing returns. The first 80% often takes 20% of the effort while the last 20% takes 80% of the effort, see Pareto_Principle
Arming Potential Victims
Firstly I didn’t say arm children, I said arm potential victims. The teachers as well as children are potential victims. Arming young children would be foolish.
College aged “children” could and should be armed. These “children” are required to register for military service in the USA so the government expects them to fight wars. There are a wide variety of weapons costing from $10 to $300. From pepper spray to a very good handgun people can be effectively and inexpensively armed. For less than the cost of an iPod a person can purchase a self-defense weapon that lasts a lifetime.
A few days of training is all that is required to teach a person to safely defend themselves with several weapons including firearms. Cheap Class or World Class
More importantly everyone doesn’t need to be armed. Just one potential victim in an attack is enough. Consider the recent Virginia Tech shooting. Two of the victims were trained military. Either of them could have easily stopped the event the second it started.
Arming people is both a deterrent and a way to stop an attack in progress.
I feel prevention is much more important. Look at the probabilities I showed you, they also work against an attacker. The math is backwards. The terrorist doesn’t want to find an armed non-victim. So if 25% of people are armed and the terrorist attacks a group of 10 people there is a 94% chance the terrorist will face an armed “non-victim” 1 – (1-.25)^10 = 94% That is a HUGE deterrent. And in the case of a terrorist attacking 10 people there are probably more people close enough to hear the shooting.
Israel didn’t arm the children, they armed the teachers. One armed teacher per 20 students was enough for Israeli’s to stop that type of attack. Terrorism didn’t stop but that type of attack did stop.
You don’t have to out run the bear, just the other guy.
In this case all you need to do is make it hard enough that terrorists find something else to do. And if you give them positive alternatives that are much easier that is what they will do.
Make peace cheap and easy, war expensive and difficult and show people this is true and you will get peace.
“Almost everything current society does regarding children helps terrorists. Grouping children together makes them easy to find. Declaring schools “weapon free” makes it easy for terrorists to identify children as defenseless. This has the same effect as putting a pile of food out in the middle of bear territory.
Israel realized this problem and solved it. In the 1970’s several schools were attacked by gun wielding terrorists. Israel enacted a law requiring all children to be accompanied by an armed adult. Since that law no attacks have occurred on Israeli schools.”
Not sure I buy everything in your post but the above part is a fact that I believe doesn’t get nearly enough coverage. I applaud you for bucking political correctness and mentioning this here. It really bugs me that this is not looked at as an option in our schools. Instead we do exactly the opposite of having armed “guards”. We make it completely illegal, even for those with concealed weapon permits.
It seems I’ve hit a nerve with this article.
I want to stress that 1. DESIRE and 3. CONNECTING TO GOAL are probably the most important functions to stop and neither of those have anything to do with weapons. If no one has a desire (motive) to commit a crime/terrorism then none will happen. And if no one connects violence with getting their desired goal then violence (crime/terrorism) is stopped.
Those two functions might be hard to measure be they cost little to implement and have better and longer lasting effects than the others. Remember that violence is often a reaction to a feeling of powerlessness. Making sure people FEEL and do ACTUALLY have OPTIONS prevents violence.
The crazed gunman type of attack want to feel power over the victims. The suicide bomber believes their is no other action that will work. And regular criminals believe that stealing or harming someone is the easiest way to get what they want.
Imagine if everything was free. I don’t mean the price but rather the real energy and material costs. It was so easy to get anything you desired that you could always have more than you could use. Why would anyone commit violence? It would be much easier to just walk away and find another place to get what you want. Feeling you have options and actually having plenty of readily available options helps with everything including reducing violence. This is just one of the benefits of Predictive Innovation and bringing Abundance into existence.
[…] Personal responsibility is the solution. Even if the crazy policies are in place you don’t have to turn your brain off. First, don’t report every little thing. Use some common sense. Regarding fears of violence follow these ideas, and also read “How to Stop Suicide Bombers and other Criminals” […]
[…] read more | digg story […]