<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Mark Proffitt &#187; IP law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://markproffitt.com/tag/ip-law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://markproffitt.com</link>
	<description>Predictive Innovation for Business &#38; Society</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 16:05:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>$214 million &#8220;Dog ate my homework&#8221; handout in new patent law</title>
		<link>http://markproffitt.com/2011/09/16/214-million-dog-ate-my-homework-handout-in-new-patent-law/</link>
		<comments>http://markproffitt.com/2011/09/16/214-million-dog-ate-my-homework-handout-in-new-patent-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 09:49:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[failure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markproffitt.com/?p=1147</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are many things wrong with the concept of patents. This handout to a politically connected law firm further demonstrates the error of claiming ownership of an idea. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/08/business/patent-bill-could-save-a-law-firm-millions.html]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://markproffitt.com/2011/09/16/214-million-dog-ate-my-homework-handout-in-new-patent-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UserFriendly: US Court of Appeals Changes Meaning of Innovate</title>
		<link>http://markproffitt.com/2010/05/09/userfriendly-us-court-of-appeals-changes-meaning-of-innovate/</link>
		<comments>http://markproffitt.com/2010/05/09/userfriendly-us-court-of-appeals-changes-meaning-of-innovate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 May 2010 18:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[funny]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monopoly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scarcity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markproffitt.com/?p=659</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[US Court of Appeals Changes Meaning of Innovate innovate a. noun To begin or introduce (something new) for or as if for the first time see monopolize]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://markproffitt.com/2010/05/09/userfriendly-us-court-of-appeals-changes-meaning-of-innovate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Details of Abundance Based Intellectual Property System</title>
		<link>http://markproffitt.com/2010/04/20/details-of-abundance-based-intellectual-property-system/</link>
		<comments>http://markproffitt.com/2010/04/20/details-of-abundance-based-intellectual-property-system/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 18:58:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Abundance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sharing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business model]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intellectual property law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[invention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nsf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[payment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[techdirt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[x-prize]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markproffitt.com/?p=647</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My article Abundance Based Intellectual Property System is being discussed at TechDirt. The fundamental point is that R&#038;D is different from manufacturing and marketing. For a system to promote innovation it must reward those two different tasks separately. And the best system aligns all parties instead of pitting them against each other. Unfortunately the fundamental [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://markproffitt.com/2010/04/20/details-of-abundance-based-intellectual-property-system/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

