<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why do 88% of Ideas Fail to Make it to Market?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://markproffitt.com/2007/02/21/why-do-88-of-ideas-fail-to-make-it-to-market/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://markproffitt.com/2007/02/21/why-do-88-of-ideas-fail-to-make-it-to-market/</link>
	<description>Predictive Innovation for Business &#38; Society</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 06:07:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark</title>
		<link>http://markproffitt.com/2007/02/21/why-do-88-of-ideas-fail-to-make-it-to-market/comment-page-1/#comment-20113</link>
		<dc:creator>mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2011 00:13:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markproffitt.com/2007/02/21/why-do-88-of-ideas-fail-to-make-it-to-market/#comment-20113</guid>
		<description>Jullian, That number comes from a variety of sources. It also depends on what you call &quot;an idea&quot;. If you start from raw idea it takes 3000 ideas to get one success, or 96.7% failure.  If you look at products that are launched, the failure rate is 40%. I got that 88% number from looking at several sources and comparing ideas that received some level of work, not just raw ideas.  One of the sources I used was this. 

Stevens, Greg and Burley, James (1997), “3,00 Raw Ideas = 1 Commercial Success”, Research Technology
Management, 40(3), May-June 1997, 16-27.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jullian, That number comes from a variety of sources. It also depends on what you call &#8220;an idea&#8221;. If you start from raw idea it takes 3000 ideas to get one success, or 96.7% failure.  If you look at products that are launched, the failure rate is 40%. I got that 88% number from looking at several sources and comparing ideas that received some level of work, not just raw ideas.  One of the sources I used was this. </p>
<p>Stevens, Greg and Burley, James (1997), “3,00 Raw Ideas = 1 Commercial Success”, Research Technology<br />
Management, 40(3), May-June 1997, 16-27.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Juliann Tilley</title>
		<link>http://markproffitt.com/2007/02/21/why-do-88-of-ideas-fail-to-make-it-to-market/comment-page-1/#comment-20092</link>
		<dc:creator>Juliann Tilley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 12:54:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markproffitt.com/2007/02/21/why-do-88-of-ideas-fail-to-make-it-to-market/#comment-20092</guid>
		<description>Interesting article, Mark.

What is the source for your statistic &#039;88% of ideas fail to make it to market&#039;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting article, Mark.</p>
<p>What is the source for your statistic &#8217;88% of ideas fail to make it to market&#8217;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Markham</title>
		<link>http://markproffitt.com/2007/02/21/why-do-88-of-ideas-fail-to-make-it-to-market/comment-page-1/#comment-512</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Markham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 15:45:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markproffitt.com/2007/02/21/why-do-88-of-ideas-fail-to-make-it-to-market/#comment-512</guid>
		<description>Great article, Mark.

It reminds me of a couple of good books, &quot;The Innovator&#039;s Delemma&quot; and &quot;Serious Creativity&quot;

Lots of companies would do better if they simply started applying some of the principles you lay out. There&#039;s a huge difference between creativity and innovation, and a huge difference between innovation and disruptive innovation. Those are all terms each business manager must understand at a gut level.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article, Mark.</p>
<p>It reminds me of a couple of good books, &#8220;The Innovator&#8217;s Delemma&#8221; and &#8220;Serious Creativity&#8221;</p>
<p>Lots of companies would do better if they simply started applying some of the principles you lay out. There&#8217;s a huge difference between creativity and innovation, and a huge difference between innovation and disruptive innovation. Those are all terms each business manager must understand at a gut level.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

